Striving for greatness

Thoughts on emerging tech, open source, and life

How to disagree

Paul Graham‘s writing is hit-or-miss for me. His most recent posting, called “How to Disagree,” definitely hit home. Everyone involved in a community should read it. It describes a hierarchy of disagreement types from irrelevant insults to arguments that actually refute to the main point. After you read it, you will recognize which responses are baseless claims and which ones deserve consideration. This will also help in understanding debates of all sorts that you aren’t involved in but just observe.

Advertisements

Written by Donnie Berkholz

March 29, 2008 at 10:27 pm

Posted in Blog

Tagged with , ,

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Thanks for leading me to this article… I have bookmarked it..

    zeniamai

    March 29, 2008 at 11:20 pm

  2. The thing is, that article is pretty much expressly written to counter a well written, informative article that disagreed with a ridiculous theory that painting and writing software were the same skills. This is why you see things like “I don’t like the tone” in Graham’s hierarchy, when you almost never see that sort of “disagreement”.

    Worse is, the article secretly disobeys every rule he lays out. Since he never mentions the article in question, the reader never realizes he’s not aspiring to the top end of his own hierarchy.

    jldugger

    April 4, 2008 at 7:44 pm

  3. Interesting to know. What he said has the same meaning to me, even if his reasons for saying it may not have been the best.

    Donnie Berkholz

    April 4, 2008 at 8:30 pm

  4. […] friends and influence people Posted in Blog by Donnie Berkholz on April 5th, 2008 Recently I mentioned Paul Graham’s essay on how to disagree, which described types of disagreement. This post will […]


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: